Evolution or Creationism?

There seem to be two prevalent theories of how the Universe and life came about, at least in Western societies. Serious and devout Christians adamantly espouse the theory that the World and everything which exists was created just as all things appear today. This is the most basic theory of Christianity dealing with how things came to be. Evolution, on the other hand, takes the view that the Universe emerged from an explosion some 4.6 million years ago, using scientific findings to support the theory. These findings have come about, as I understand it, through astronomy and the finding of material so minute of such an age that it is considered to be the oldest material found. It is associated only with certain conditions that would be existent only in an intense and immense explosion of the kind posited in the theory. This concept, despite the laws of physics it seems to uncover, primarily says that all of creation was the result of a chance detonation of some unfathomable strength. From the creation of all the material, somehow life came about and began to evolve into its myriad of forms found on this planet, not to mention any that could exist on the hundreds of billions of planets that more than likely exist in the others hundreds of millions of galaxies in the Universe. Christianity uses the Bible as its foundation for its theory and maintains that faith in the Word and the God presented in the Bible is all that is needed to understand that the Creation was by Divine Design. I think that neither theory is completely correct and that the truth of the matter lies somewhere between the two and includes parts of both.

The problem with both viewpoints is that each sets acceptance criteria that are narrowed to support the appropriate theory. Science's parameters are necessarily strict and rigid, but can't allow for something unseen and improvable. Christianity allows only belief and faith in the tenet that the World was created a mere ten thousand years ago and that all was created in the form it demonstrates in present day. So, each excludes the other and neither allows for another plausible possibility which should be considered. That is that The Creator has worked things out from the great initial explosion through evolution. This is the only theory I can find that brings both sides together in a sensible plausible form. To explain the theory, some acceptance of both sides must be allowed.

The idea of Evolution is completely substantiated in the millions of bits of information and artifacts scientists have uncovered, analyzed, recorded, and stored. Creationism relies on the interpretation of a book and its genealogy as well its historical timeline and religious relics also stored away. Science can and does show very clearly the development of hundreds of thousands of species back to their most basic forms, in many cases. The DNA of all terrestrial life, not aquatic, has been traced to a single species of dinosaur that managed to survive the ice ages, floods, and planetary fire storms. If DNA identifies criminals with next-to-no-doubt, or even absolutely, then it is very reasonable to accept the identification of a species as the antecedent of today's life where DNA is the main proof or only proof. But, the creature in question lived much earlier than ten thousand years ago. (I believe it existed some 2 billion years ago. I'm not sure of the age.) Moreover, there is plain proof that the World, in addition to glaciations, has experienced catastrophic firestorms thought to have been initiated by meteor impacts at least twice. These firestorms destroyed all surface life as well as, probably, all aquatic life. This is thought to have happened because at least two specific layers of carbon can be found worldwide in the same comparable geologic layers of the planet. The only explanation for such global carbonization has to be intense firestorms that proliferated and destroyed all organic matter on the planet within hours. Meteors of great size would cause just such an event. Evidence also indicates that gigantic tsunamis swept over many continents planet wide in conjunction with the firestorms. A meteor strike could have caused the tsunamis also. Lastly, there is geological evidence of meteor impacts both in the Pacific and in the area of the Caribbean Sea where immense undersea craters have been located. The only explanation for the craters seems to be they result from meteor impacts. None of this evidence is in accordance with the Christian belief that the World and all that is was created ten thousand years ago.

Here is where one's understanding has to make a leap or at least a change in perspective. We need to stop thinking of life as a physical characteristic and begin to perceive it as the motive force of all that is defined as living. To be alive, something has to contain an energy field and has to process earth, water, and/or gaseous elements to maintain and generate the energy it demonstrates. One caveat here is that water may not be necessary to sustain the energy we call life since bacteria live and thrive in rock strata miles below the surface. Whether or not these bacteria somehow have access to water, I don’t know. Also, oxygen, it has been discovered, is not necessary to life as once was taught. Bacteria and other creatures live in highly toxic waters of fumaroles found in the Pacific at extreme depths. These creatures, as with the bacteria in the deep rock strata, live in lightless environments also. So, light is left out of the list of requirements for the generation of the life energy. Heat also seems to be outside the limits previously thought since the bacteria living around the fumaroles live in extremely warm if not hot water which are heated by volcanic heat rising through the earth and into the ocean.

How do Evolution and Creationism intersect? The intersection is where the life force comes into play. To understand this, one has to think about some of the teachings of the various religion of the world. Probably, the main tenet of all of the best known religions is that there is one dynamic force which is thought to have originated life as we know it. It is part of every particle of the Universe, whether matter or energy. Being part of every particle, this force—call it God, Allah, or the Creator—has to be everywhere or it simply can’t be at all. The Universe is all that is. Therefore, this Force has to be part of it and it can’t be restricted to some single sector where it rules like a distant king or emperor. Instead, it is part of everything. It is the guiding force of all that lives. It is the primary force behind Evolution. It is Intelligence and the Living Force of Life. It experiments with every single species from the inside trying to improve that species to its highest potential. It developed Man’s brain and is having fun with Man’s development. It has been in every single creature that ever was and will be in every single creature yet to evolve. Luckily, we have individual awareness, but animals and insects of all kinds to too. Otherwise, they wouldn’t try to hard to avoid danger or threats.

For dichotomous reasons, neither Science nor Creationism allows for this all-pervasive Intelligence. Neither is one-hundred percent right, not is either one-hundred percent wrong. Both are both. The answer is in the middle. Yes, Evolution is a fact and, yes, Creationism is too. It’s simply that neither actually takes the form being espoused by either side. The answer to both is as I’ve described above.
Think about it.

Walk in Peace, Love, and Harmony.

Quietwalker